Compare

Signando REST vs. F5 BIG-IP

Specialized API Security vs. Multi-Purpose Hardware Appliance. Why a focused software gateway is better than an expensive all-in-one box.

Why Teams Switch to Signando REST

Complete OpenAPI Validation

F5 BIG-IP ASM uses generic WAF rules. Signando REST validates every request and response against your specific OpenAPI specification - more precise, fewer false positives.

Response Validation

F5 BIG-IP focuses on incoming traffic. Signando REST also validates all backend responses - protection against data exfiltration through compromised backends.

Software-Based & Cloud-Native

No expensive hardware appliance needed. Signando REST runs as a container in any environment - on-premise, cloud, or hybrid.

Transparent Costs

F5 BIG-IP requires significant investments in hardware and licenses. Signando REST offers a transparent software license without hardware lock-in.

The Problem with F5 BIG-IP as API Security

Hardware Dependency

F5 BIG-IP is primarily a hardware appliance. High acquisition costs, limited scalability, and vendor lock-in are the consequences.

Generic WAF Rules

BIG-IP ASM uses generic signatures instead of API-specific validation. This leads to false positives and security gaps for API attacks.

CVE History

F5 BIG-IP has had critical vulnerabilities like CVE-2020-5902 (CVSS 10.0) and CVE-2022-1388 (CVSS 9.8). Rust eliminates these risks architecturally.

Ready for Real API Security?

Contact us for a demo and personalized consultation.

Contact UsView 181 Tests